Pachinko Relationships

 The relationships between characters in the novel Pachinko reflect the complex history of Korean-Japanese relations, particularly during the colonial period. Akiko's attitude towards Noa, as described in the quote, highlights the ways in which some Japanese people view Koreans as exotic, foreign, and inferior. This attitude is similar to the way that Hansu views Sunja, as someone who is not quite equal to him in status and who is therefore disposable. The novel also shows how relationships between Koreans and Japanese can be fraught with power imbalances, prejudices, and misunderstandings. Sunja's relationship with Hansu, for example, is characterized by Hansu's exploitation of Sunja's vulnerability and his disregard for her feelings. This is in contrast to her later relationship with Isak, which is based on mutual respect and love. Through these relationships, the novel shows a range of emotions about colonialism, including anger, resentment, and grief. The experiences of the characters show the lasting impact of Japan's colonization of Korea, which has resulted in ongoing discrimination, prejudice, and inequality. At the same time, the novel also depicts moments of connection and understanding between Koreans and Japanese, suggesting that there is the potential for healing and reconciliation despite the trauma of the past.

Comments

  1. Hey Griffin! I really liked your insight into misunderstanding, disposability, and power inbalance between Japan and Korea as well as their parallels in Hansu and Sunja's relationship. Just as Lee features moments of mutual respect and understanding between Japanese and Korean people, do you think that she is implying that Hansu and Sunja could have a healthy relationship?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Griffin, I agree that the "exoticizing" of Koreans in Japan has a profound negative impact on relationships. While this attitude of Koreans as being a novelty seems preferable to the power dynamic between Sunja and Hansu, it is damaging in the sense that Koreans are never fully accepted as normal people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Griffin, I like your analysis here. Status seems to be the driving force of pretty much every interaction between two people that don't share similar identities. It's interesting how a social construct like that can radically alter someone's thoughts of another person based on preconceived notions like that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts